Comrade Alastair

Pro-worker/Anti-Capitalist

Archive for July 2008

Nepalese Maoists threaten to take up arms again

without comments

 
 

 

(as far as i know, this is the first time since the Constituent Assembly elections that the Maoists have made an open and serious threat to take up arms once again. I see this as a positive development – it shows the Maoists are not willing to abandon their goal of radically transforming Nepalese society, and if they can’t advance these goals through peaceful means, they will retrun to using violent ones.)

  Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alastair Reith

July 27, 2008 at 12:16 pm

Reactionary forces sabotage formation of Maoist-led government in Nepal

with 14 comments

 

This new and unexpected development represents a temporary setback to the unfolding revolutionary process in Nepal. But it by no means represents the end of the road – rather, as Chairman Gonzalo famously put it, this is but a bend in the road, a road that leads all the way to socialism and ultimately to communism. If the reactionaries class forces and the parties that represent them will not allow the Maoists to gain state power through peaceful democratic means, there are alternatives the Maoists can turn to – they proved to be extremely good at these alternatives during the decade long People’s War.

The CPN (M) made noises in the lead up to the elections that if it was not able to gain power through the ballot it and it’s fighters would “return to the jungle”. This may now be necessary to smash the resistance of the comprador-capitalist and landlord classes, who are desperately trying to prevent the creation of a Maoist led government that will initiate agrarian reforms based on Land to the Tiller, and will lead a program of idnustrialisation and working-class mobilisation to lay the basis for a transition to socialism.

The Maoists recieved by far the largest vote in the elections, and the efforts by the other parties to block the democratic will of the Nepalese masses only reveals their true and reactionary nature.

In government, the Maoists could have achieved huge things for Nepal, and they were always clear that this would have to be backed up by and carried out through mass mobilisation and class struggle. In opposition, the Maoists may not be able to effect their revolutionary policies, but with their mass support and stunning organisation skills, they have the strength to resist anything the reactionary classes throw at them, and perhaps even to advance their radical agenda outside of the halls of office.

Nobody can say right now where things will go from here, but one things for sure – it’s going to be bloody interesting to watch. All eyes must remain on the New Nepal – Lal Salaam!

The Maoists will not participate in the government of Nepal
10 minutes ago

KATHMANDU (AFP) - The Nepalese Maoists, whose presidential candidate was defeated on Monday, will not participate in the first government of the Republic of Nepal, plunging the country into a new political crisis.

Read the rest of this entry »

How revolutionaries choose their political priorities

with 4 comments

How we choose our political priorities

How we intervene in bourgeois elections

A study guide

Workers Party platform
1. Opposition to all New Zealand and Western imperialist intervention in the Third World and all Western imperialist alliances.

2. Secure jobs for all with a living wage and a shorter working week.

3. For the unrestricted right of workers to organise and take industrial action and no limits on workers’ freedom of speech and activity.

4. For working class unity and solidarity – equality for women, Maori and other ethnic minorities and people of all sexual orientations and identities; open borders and full rights for migrant workers.

5. For a working people’s republic

I have become more and more convinced – and the thing now is to drum this conviction into the English working class – that they will never be able to do anything decisive here in England before they separate their attitude towards Ireland quite definitely from that of the ruling classes, and not only make common cause with the Irish, but even take the initiative in dissolving the Union established in 1801, and substituting a free federal relationship for it. And this must be done not out of sympathy for Ireland, but as a demand based on the interests of the English proletariat. If not, the English people will remain bound to the leading-strings of the ruling classes, because they will be forced to make a common front with them against Ireland.

- Marx to Kugelmann, November 29, 1869

The way I shall express the matter next Tuesday is: that, quite apart from all ‘international’ and ‘humane’ phrases about Justice for Ireland – which are taken for granted on the International Council – it is in the direct and absolute interests of the English working class to get rid of their present connexion with Ireland. I am fully convinced of this, for reasons that, in part, I cannot tell the English workers themselves. For a long time I believed it would be possible to overthrow the Irish regime by English working class ascendancy. I always took this viewpoint in the New-York Tribune. Deeper study has now convinced me of the opposite. The English working class will never accomplish anything before it has got rid of Ireland. The lever must be applied in Ireland. This is why the Irish question is so important for the social movement in general.

- Marx to Engels, December 10, 1869

Over 130 years ago, Marx (and Engels) made the point that the key to the British revolution was the national-revolutionary struggle in Ireland. Central to this was their idea that as long as British workers went along with their own ruling class’s policy of oppressing Ireland British workers would never reach revolutionary consciousness and never seriously threaten the dominance of the British ruling class in Britain itself no matter how splendidly organised they were in trade unions or how militant they were in demanding wage rises.

The centrality of political questions to the class struggle should be well-established by now, but it is often not well-understood on the far left. Or, where lip-service is paid to it, little is done in practice and/or the political issues which are chosen are weak in class content and don’t raise fundamental questions about the system or really open up opportunities for such questions to be raised.

Read the rest of this entry »

San Francisco anarchists desecrate monument to internationalism

with 10 comments

 

http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20080719224947226

 

Contributed by: Anonymous
Views: 110

Direct Action to commemorate the beginning of the Spanish Civil War the right way…July 19th is the anniversary of the beginning of the Spanish Civil War in 1936 — the beginning of the last significant attempt at an anti-capitalist revolution in the period of revolutions that began in Mexico in 1915 and accelerated after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The revolutionary movement in Spain was defeated by a counter-revolution spearheaded by the Stalinist Soviet Union and it’s global puppets and public relations hacks. (See George Orwells’s ‘Homage to Catalonia’ for the best brief introduction to the events surrounding the revolution and counter-revolution in Spain.)
A public art work celebrating the role played by the Abraham Lincoln Battalion, the US dupes of and cannon fodder for the Stalinist counter-revolution in Spain from 1936 to 1939, was dedicated this past May on San Francisco’s Embarcadero, behind the fountain on Justin Herman Plaza at the foot of Market Street. Sometime this past week, some person or persons unknown gave this monument to the one of the big lies of 20th century history an appropriate makeover. The Stalinist art work was grafittied with the message, “Viva Durruti Y Orwell,” in what appears to be red and black spray paint.
The Abraham Lincoln Brigade was the name of the workers, students, farmers and intellectuals who left their homes in the United States to fight fascism, and protect the democratically elected Republican regime ruling Spain at the time.
Read the rest of this entry »

RAM/SW is an apple

with 2 comments

The Residents Action Movement began as an electoral front group in Auckland, formed largely by members of the Socialist Worker organisation. It originally ran only in the Auckland local body elections, and ran eight candidates in 2004. One of it’s candidates, Robyn Hughes, was elected to the Auckland Regional Council.

RAM did not fare so well in the 2007 local body elections, with it’s vote count for the Auckland Regional Council dropping to 76,000. It’s only councilor also lost her seat.

Read the rest of this entry »

New Zealand Pacific Party attempts to register for the 08 election

with 5 comments

The NZ Pacific Party was founded by former Labour MP Taito Philip Fields, and claims to represent “Christian and family values as well as standing for social justice”. As things stand, that is all that’s known of it’s politics, as the Party has not put forward any other policies or made any other statements.

field_cwcbV_17824
(Taito Philip Fields)

Read the rest of this entry »

No justice for victims of police brutality

with 2 comments

On June 25th, a white jury in Tauranga found Police Sergeant Keith Parsons, Senior Constable Bruce Laing, Constable John Mills and Sergeant Erle Busby not guilty of brutally assaulting Rawiri Falwasser, a young Maori, in October 2006.

With police like these, who needs criminals?

Rewi Falwasser suffered a mental breakdown on Labour Day 2006, and was not in control of his own actions. This is accepted by the police. He was arrested after stealing a neighbours car and driving erratically, endangering both himself and other people on the road.

The police took him to Whakatane police station, and put him in a holding cell. When they later came to remove him from the cell and take him to be photographed, he refused to leave the cell. According to Crown Prosecutor Fletcher Pilditch, Mr Falwasser was “stressed, confused and agitated”.

Following Falwasser’s refusal to leave the cell, Sergeant Parsons repeatedly sprayed him in the face with pepper-spray, and when he put up his hands to protect himself from this attack Parsons lashed out at his head with a baton, striking him on the hand and the wrist and leaving him with a 6½-centimetre cut to his arm.

Read the rest of this entry »