Comrade Alastair

Pro-worker/Anti-Capitalist

Archive for the ‘anti-imperialism’ Category

Are Nepal’s Maoists on a revisionist path?

with 2 comments

Maoist supporters take part in an anti-government torch rally

Since the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Accord in 2006, revolutionary communists across the world have treated the shift in tactics of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) with a mixture of suspicion and outright hostility. They have been accused of revisionism, of betraying the revolution, of surrendering the achievements of the People’s War and moving towards reformism. This is a debate that I expect will go on until either the succesful seizure of state power by the Maobadi or their defeat at the hands of reaction. However, I feel that in the context of very low international support for what is probably the single most advanced revolutionary struggle in the world today, this is an important debate to be engaged in. The actual line and practice of Nepal’s revolutionaries needs to be given exposition and support. Criticisms should still be made as appropriate, but the general tendency on the Western ‘left’ is to act as if the Nepali Maoists owe *us* something, that they somehow need to prove themselves before we extend them support. Considering the life and death struggle for people’s power that has been going on for more than a decade and continues today, and considering the thousands of martyrs who gave their lives for a better world during the People’s War, this attitude is both deeply wrong and deeply arrogant.

The Nepali revolution is a living process. It, like all other things, is filled with contradiction and is constantly changing. It is not possible to do it justice in a short blog post. But I have been engaging in arguments in support of the UCPN (M) for some time now, and feel that some of the arguments I have made can hopefully help to shed light on the situation there. I don’t claim to be an ‘expert’, and my knowledge of events in Nepal is very limited. But from what I have been able to gain through Nepali and international media, first hand statements from foreign communists visiting Nepal and of course the public statements of the Maoist leadership, I am filled with hope and deeply inspired by the revolution unfolding right before our eyes in Nepal.


It needs our support. The arisen people of Nepal need our solidarity. Lal salam. Read the rest of this entry »

Prachanda: “If the mandate of the CA election is further ridiculed we will declare war”

without comments

Prachanda gave a speech at a book launching ceremony yesterday which from all accounts was pretty damn fiery. According to Telegraph Nepal, he stressed that the “The Constituent Assembly and the Peace Process are the offspring of the decade long revolt undertaken by the Maoists’ Party”, and stated that “if the constitution drafting process and the peace process were blocked, there will be yet another fierce revolt.”

The TN article was entitled “Fresh Nepal revolt may take toll of One Million”, a rather suspect move on their part. They obviously lifted a single line from his speech (quoted in the article) in which he noted that a revolutionary seizure of power by the masses would result in many deaths. The way the title is worded implies that Prachanda is callously playing with the lives of people and indeed delights in their possible deaths, but his actual words tell a different story. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alastair Reith

September 6, 2009 at 4:54 am

Presidential coup in Nepal

without comments

Below is an article I wrote a week or two ago for the Spark, the Workers Party paper, briefly going into some of what’s been taking place over the past wee few months and describing in particular the recent events surrounding the presidential coup. A shortened version will be in the next Spark (look out for us in Cuba mall and elsewhere on Saturday morning, only costs a dollar!), but readers of this blog get to see it in all it’s unedited glory. :-)

The fierce one: Prachanda, leader of the UCPN (M), and former Prime Minister of Nepal

The fierce one: Prachanda, leader of the UCPN (M), and former Prime Minister of Nepal

Presidential coup in Nepal

By Alastair Reith

The last time the Spark carried news from Nepal, the story was positive. The Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) had been elected to government with just under forty percent of the seats (more than the next two parties put together). It’s leader Prachanda was Prime Minister. Previous to this, it had waged a decade long People’s War that liberated eighty percent of the countryside and radicalised the workers and peasants of the country in support of revolutionary change. Under the slogan of a new Nepal, the Maoist-led government attempted to bring about land reform, build national industry, empower and improve the lives of workers, and fight against the domination of foreign imperialism, in particular Indian expansionism. However, this article describes events of a much less positive nature.

Read the rest of this entry »

The argument for Open Borders

without comments

(above: refugees in an Australian concentration camp)

This was originally a post I wrote on Revleft, a forum I frequent. JimmyJazz and Spartan are the names of two people on the forum, and this post was a reply to a thread JJ started advocating that the US somehow “close it’s borders”. I tried to cover all the arguments against Open Borders put forward by leftists, and raised many of the arguments for it.

JimmyJazz, don’t quote from my sig to justify you’re position. I am an advocate of Open Borders, and the Lenin quote in question does not in any way justify more border controls.

Basically, you’re entire argument is disconnected from reality. You see the capitalist state repressing and discriminating against immigrants, and you see the capitalist class using the fact that these immigrants are illegal (and thus denied contracts, union rmembership etc) to make them a social underclass, and your solution is… “closed borders”.

JJ, the US border is already closed, You are only able to cross it legally with the permission of the capitalist state in the form of visas or whatever. And please explain to me how, in concrete terms, the border can be made any more closed than it is. Do you really think the US is going to build a gigantic wall along it’s border, so high (and perhaps electrified and covered in poisoned spikes) that noone can cross it? Do you have any idea how much that would cost? There already is a wall being built along the US-Mexico border, and that’s proven to be both ridiculously expensive and ineffective – immigrants can still get in.

Read the rest of this entry »

Western imperialist hypocrisy over South Ossetia

with 2 comments

Tskhinval after the Georgian attack

Tskhinval after the Georgian attack

Bosnian parliament in Sarajevo after Serbian attack

Bosnian parliament in Sarajevo after Serbian attack

(Above: Spot the difference!)

In the weeks leading up to the recent conflict in South Ossetia and Georgia, the big news was that the Serbian general Radovan Karadzic had been captured. The capitalist media was spitting with fury at the heinous crimes this foul, despicable monster had committed. The most heavily denounced of these was his use of artillery strikes against the civilian areas of Sarajevo. The actions of Karadzic were carried out in the name of preserving Yugoslavia’s territorial integrity against ethnic separatists.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alastair Reith

September 3, 2008 at 7:21 am

New People’s Army in the Philippines – Enviromentalism in Action

with one comment

(The New People’s Army, military wing of the Communist Party of the Philippines, has attacked and destroyed buildings and machinery belonging to the Philex Mining Corporation, which was conducting gold mining operations in the area. It’s operations were causing grievous enviromental destruction to the area, and the people of the area were suffering from this. The NPA is proving through it’s actions it’s commitment to the wellbeing of the Philippino masses, it’s commitment to the national demoratic revolution and the socialist revolution, and it’s opposition to the enviromental destruction inflicted by capitalism on the world.

Read the rest of this entry »

How revolutionaries choose their political priorities

with 4 comments

How we choose our political priorities

How we intervene in bourgeois elections

A study guide

Workers Party platform
1. Opposition to all New Zealand and Western imperialist intervention in the Third World and all Western imperialist alliances.

2. Secure jobs for all with a living wage and a shorter working week.

3. For the unrestricted right of workers to organise and take industrial action and no limits on workers’ freedom of speech and activity.

4. For working class unity and solidarity – equality for women, Maori and other ethnic minorities and people of all sexual orientations and identities; open borders and full rights for migrant workers.

5. For a working people’s republic

I have become more and more convinced – and the thing now is to drum this conviction into the English working class – that they will never be able to do anything decisive here in England before they separate their attitude towards Ireland quite definitely from that of the ruling classes, and not only make common cause with the Irish, but even take the initiative in dissolving the Union established in 1801, and substituting a free federal relationship for it. And this must be done not out of sympathy for Ireland, but as a demand based on the interests of the English proletariat. If not, the English people will remain bound to the leading-strings of the ruling classes, because they will be forced to make a common front with them against Ireland.

- Marx to Kugelmann, November 29, 1869

The way I shall express the matter next Tuesday is: that, quite apart from all ‘international’ and ‘humane’ phrases about Justice for Ireland – which are taken for granted on the International Council – it is in the direct and absolute interests of the English working class to get rid of their present connexion with Ireland. I am fully convinced of this, for reasons that, in part, I cannot tell the English workers themselves. For a long time I believed it would be possible to overthrow the Irish regime by English working class ascendancy. I always took this viewpoint in the New-York Tribune. Deeper study has now convinced me of the opposite. The English working class will never accomplish anything before it has got rid of Ireland. The lever must be applied in Ireland. This is why the Irish question is so important for the social movement in general.

- Marx to Engels, December 10, 1869

Over 130 years ago, Marx (and Engels) made the point that the key to the British revolution was the national-revolutionary struggle in Ireland. Central to this was their idea that as long as British workers went along with their own ruling class’s policy of oppressing Ireland British workers would never reach revolutionary consciousness and never seriously threaten the dominance of the British ruling class in Britain itself no matter how splendidly organised they were in trade unions or how militant they were in demanding wage rises.

The centrality of political questions to the class struggle should be well-established by now, but it is often not well-understood on the far left. Or, where lip-service is paid to it, little is done in practice and/or the political issues which are chosen are weak in class content and don’t raise fundamental questions about the system or really open up opportunities for such questions to be raised.

Read the rest of this entry »

San Francisco anarchists desecrate monument to internationalism

with 10 comments

 

http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20080719224947226

 

Contributed by: Anonymous
Views: 110

Direct Action to commemorate the beginning of the Spanish Civil War the right way…July 19th is the anniversary of the beginning of the Spanish Civil War in 1936 — the beginning of the last significant attempt at an anti-capitalist revolution in the period of revolutions that began in Mexico in 1915 and accelerated after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The revolutionary movement in Spain was defeated by a counter-revolution spearheaded by the Stalinist Soviet Union and it’s global puppets and public relations hacks. (See George Orwells’s ‘Homage to Catalonia’ for the best brief introduction to the events surrounding the revolution and counter-revolution in Spain.)
A public art work celebrating the role played by the Abraham Lincoln Battalion, the US dupes of and cannon fodder for the Stalinist counter-revolution in Spain from 1936 to 1939, was dedicated this past May on San Francisco’s Embarcadero, behind the fountain on Justin Herman Plaza at the foot of Market Street. Sometime this past week, some person or persons unknown gave this monument to the one of the big lies of 20th century history an appropriate makeover. The Stalinist art work was grafittied with the message, “Viva Durruti Y Orwell,” in what appears to be red and black spray paint.
The Abraham Lincoln Brigade was the name of the workers, students, farmers and intellectuals who left their homes in the United States to fight fascism, and protect the democratically elected Republican regime ruling Spain at the time.
Read the rest of this entry »

A Beacon of Hope shines from Nepal

with one comment

(this was also written as a post on www.Revleft.com, as part of the ongoing debate within the revolutionary socialist movement about Nepal. It was actually largely in reply to the pessimistic comments of a Maoist, a RL member of the Revolutionary Communist Party in the US, which shows that even within the Maoist current opinion is divided. I intend to write an in depth, well researched full length article about Nepal some time in the future, that will go over the ground I briefly covered here and elsewhere in a much deeper way. Watch this space…)

I reject the idea that the CPN (M) is going in the direction of becoming a “capitalist” party. The Bolsheviks did not immediately implement socialism, and that was in a large country with a strong industrial working class (it was a minority, but it was still much larger and stronger than anything Nepal has), and much greater development of national capital. Lenin referred to what the Bolsheviks were implementing as “state capitalism”, not socialism (which makes the Cliffite use of the term even more ridiculous), does that make him “pro-capitalist” and the Bolsheviks a “capitalist party”?

Read the rest of this entry »

New Zealand police propping up Tongan monarchy

without comments

April 2008

 

The Kingdom of Tonga has announced that it will be appointing a New Zealand policeman to be its new Police Commander. The news was made public on April 2, with the Ministry of Police, Prisons and Fire Services stating that none of the seven Tongan candidates were “suitable”.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alastair Reith

June 30, 2008 at 5:56 am